Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:53 TARDE EST
Descripción
Fen. Dead swamp beaver flood. .
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:54 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:55 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:56 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:57 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:58 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 04:59 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:00 TARDE EST
Descripción
Hemlock forest with balsam fir.
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:01 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:02 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:02 TARDE EST
Descripción
Nhf with a few spruce and oak in us.
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:03 TARDE EST
Descripción
Old sign. Oddly far from beaver wetland.
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:03 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:04 TARDE EST
Descripción
Nhtw with betpap betall querub fraame
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:06 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:06 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:07 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:08 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:08 TARDE EST
Descripción
Talus decreases about fifty feet up
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:09 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:09 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:10 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:10 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:11 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:12 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:13 TARDE EST
Descripción
Very good example of dry red oak white pine forest of the sort with low white pine cover(there was some behind me)
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:14 TARDE EST
Descripción
? Above here the pine drops out nearly pure querub
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:15 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:22 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:23 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:23 TARDE EST
Descripción
I think. Hard to tell without lvs
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:24 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:24 TARDE EST
Descripción
Very neat vp right on peak.
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:26 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:27 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:27 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:28 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:28 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:29 TARDE EST
Descripción
A few querub widely scattered. Nhf or mronhf
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:30 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:30 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:31 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:31 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:32 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:33 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:33 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:34 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:35 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:35 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:36 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:37 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:38 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:38 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:39 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:40 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:41 TARDE EST
Descripción
location is of trees not photo
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:41 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:42 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:44 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:45 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:45 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:46 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:47 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:55 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:55 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:57 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:58 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:58 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:59 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 05:59 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:00 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:01 TARDE EST
Descripción
Identification from afar... oaks very evident on this mountain. Point where the oaks were seen (note you can see that big quarry) not where the photo was taken (the photo was taken from the town of Groton).
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:01 TARDE EST
Descripción
Saplings. There's a larger one that may be planted. But they are scattered along the road even in this cold area.
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:02 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:03 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:03 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:03 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:04 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:05 TARDE EST
Descripción
photo is location of the oaks not where the photo was taken
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:05 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:06 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:07 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
04 nov. 2015
a las 06:07 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 01:41 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 01:41 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 01:42 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 01:42 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 01:43 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 07:14 TARDE EST
Fecha añadida
05 nov. 2015
a las 07:14 TARDE EST
Comentarios
Yesss! We need more people doing this. (:
i know! soooo muuuch daaata! And it was a super laid back and fun day. It would also be fun in a group of maybe two or three, too many more and you'd want to split into teams. I think iNaturalist may someday create a feature like ebird where if you are in a team of two or three you can tag the others and share the observations for that trip
Love it Charlie. To riff off the team idea, diversity is important for serious data collection. Different people = different strengths, passions, tools (long lens for birds, insect nets, microscopes, genetic sampling), and networks of friends and colleagues.
iNat can be a platform to facilitate mini-RAPs like the Chicaga Field Museum and CI used to do to catalyze conservation action, but be open and public-driven.
Oh totally.
And... just to be clear... by 'serious' i just mean intensive and focused. By all means any general naturalist including well informed amateurs can do this. It just isn't what most people do with iNat. (apparently I am by far the heaviest app user with even more app uploaded observations than Ken-ichi who created it. Which blows my mind because the app is so easy, but i also have no other camera).
I really like the idea of rapid assessments and natural community mapping with fully public data when appropriate. Obviously this doesn't apply to some situations such as rare plants, and also many cases on private land (though obscuring can allay some of that). But why not have government groups and land trusts and such share biodiversity data? It's great outreach.
Agreed!
In the absence of a "Like" button, thanks for posting.
There's a germ of an idea to work with Geocaching to direct people to make observations from certain areas in a DIY-bioblitz-like way. In a similar vein of the value of this community and the data it produces, I just wrote a new journal post.
Yeah, it's a neat idea to strategically plop points on (publically accessible) interesting areas and sending people out to see what they find. Or even combining iNat with something like this (with a healthy dose of respecting trespassing laws). Or a system that analyzes the 'nearest neighbor' to let you search for outliers and stuff. A while back Scott was looking at a system to re-verify old species records via a standalone app, not sure if it is still active in that form.
So many ideas. So many problems.
Charlie I think you're thinking of this: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/biocaching/id827737251?mt=8
Love the geohashing idea!
Yep that's it! I never got into it because I could never resist adding all the other things in addition to the target species.
Calflora has a similar app for plants found in California. I haven't used it though since calflora adds research graded flora observations on inaturalist into their database.
Oh I think I've heard of that. Does it take photos and such too? I wish there were an easier way to see stuff like that, since there's no way to click through to those on the map. I use the species maps on here a LOT.
Yes, you can add photos to each observation report. I usually use the species maps shown on other databases like calflora.org and bugguide.net to help with my identifications since the data on inaturalist is more limited in respect to certain taxa. The species map for birds and butterflies work wonders on here though since they are commonly uploaded (at least for California).
I love the calflora data, wish Vermont had something that comprehensive (the best we have is now iNaturalist for plants/moths and Ebird for birds) However I wish there were more photos on calflora that were easy to get to especially with weird range extenders and stuff. Calflora does send to GBIF right?
I don't know whether or not calflora directly share their data with GBIF although I do see some of their data on GBIF.
So iNaturalist shares to Calflora and GBIF but Cal Flora only sometimes shares with GBIF. So confusing.
Agregar un comentario