Three years ago, Crinum pedunculatum was inactivated and swapped to C. asiaticum pedunculatum as per POWO (https://powo.science.kew.org/results?q=crinum%20pedunculatum). However, all Australian authorities recognise C. pedunculatum as the valid name. The major issue with iNat having it as a variety of C. asiaticum is that this species is also present in Australia (Xmas Island, Cocos Islands), and so the records on iNat ID'ed as the variety are getting mapped to C. asiaticum and thus mispresenting its apparent range. I have therefore swapped it back and logged a deviation.