Atención: Algunas o todas las identificaciones afectadas por
esta división puede haber sido reemplazada por identificaciones de Sympetrum. Esto
ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los
taxa de salida.
Revisar identificaciones de Sympetrum frequens 428674
Dear @zebs,
Please, cancel this taxon split immediately and hence restore identifications of Sympetrum frequens from Russia!
I don't know what you were based, but:
In the extreme south-east of Russia, in the coastal southern Primorye, we definitely have two well differing species, depressiusculum and frequens. This is well published:
https://pisum.icgbio.ru/kosterin/pdf/idf_report_177_far_east.pdf This does not contradict at all the concept that S. frequens is a Japanese species, since our indifiduals of S. freqauens could migrate from Japan, which is very close, and may not comprise
ise a local population. S. frequens is known to be highly migratory speces.
There is Kunashir Island close to the north-east side of Hokkaido. This is currently in Russia but belongs to the Japanese Archipelago. It is inhabited by the genuine S. frequens, which you have now misidentified as "S. depressiusculum".
Thank you in advance,
Oleg
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
Dear @zebs,
Please, cancel this taxon split immediately and hence restore identifications of Sympetrum frequens from Russia!
I don't know what you were based, but:
In the extreme south-east of Russia, in the coastal southern Primorye, we definitely have two well differing species, depressiusculum and frequens. This is well published:
https://pisum.icgbio.ru/kosterin/pdf/idf_report_177_far_east.pdf
This does not contradict at all the concept that S. frequens is a Japanese species, since our indifiduals of S. freqauens could migrate from Japan, which is very close, and may not comprise
ise a local population. S. frequens is known to be highly migratory speces.
There is Kunashir Island close to the north-east side of Hokkaido. This is currently in Russia but belongs to the Japanese Archipelago. It is inhabited by the genuine S. frequens, which you have now misidentified as "S. depressiusculum".
Thank you in advance,
Oleg